Relapse or worsening of chronic spontaneous urticaria during SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in children: A telemedicine follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Chronic urticaria (CU), characterized by daily wheals and/or angioedema lasting more than 6 weeks, is a common skin disease. CU is classified as spontaneous or inducible. Because of Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, face-to-face visits were reduced, and many centers started remote consultations to minimize hospital admissions and risk for viral diffusion. Telemedicine became a valuable tool for evaluating and monitoring patients with chronic diseases, such as CU. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of telemedicine as a means for the follow-up of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) during the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, we collected data related to CSU evolution and treatment by remote consultation. Moreover, we specifically investigated the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination on CSU in relapsing or worsening of such a disease. METHODS: The electronic charts were reviewed for patients diagnosed with CSU, who were referred to the allergy unit of Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence. For each patient, a review of demographic characteristics, diagnostic workup, efficacy, and tolerability of the treatment was performed. Patients with a physical agent triggering CU were excluded from the study. Disease activity was monitored using the Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7). In addition, when the COVID-19 pandemic started, follow-up continued through telemedicine after an initial face-to-face visit when possible. Approximately 1 year after the diagnosis of CSU, patients were recontacted to investigate whether they had experienced a relapse or worsening of urticaria during a possible COVID-19 or immediately after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. RESULTS: From January 2020 to March 2021, 84 cases of CSU were identified, with 71 (84.5%) of these being evaluated via televisit (remote consultation). During the remote follow-up period, 38/71 (53.5%) patients who were evaluated via televisit recovered completely from CSU, while 24 (33.8%) made therapy adjustments, and 9 (12.7%) had to discontinue follow-up through remote visits and return to face-to-face visits. In February 2022, we recontacted the 71 patients with CSU, and 50 (70.4%) of them answered by phone call interview. Four (19.2%) of the 26 patients who had COVID-19 showed CSU relapse, while 1 (3.8%) had a CSU worsening. Instead, 1 (3.8%) patient of the 26 who were vaccinated had a relapse of CSU, and 1 (3.8%) had a worsening of CSU, both after the first dose. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that telemedicine can be an effective tool for the follow-up of patients with CSU. Moreover, COVID-19, as well as COVID-19 vaccination, may trigger CSU relapse or worsening, but both are unspecific triggers, and urticaria shows a very short duration in most cases.

Simplifying the drug provocation test in non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions to amoxicillin in children: The experience of a tertiary care allergy unit.

BACKGROUND: Mild non-immediate reactions (NIR) to beta-lactams (ßLs) are the most common manifestation of adverse drug reactions in children, and the drug provocation test (DPT) remains the gold standard for diagnosis. However, there are still controversies about the protocol that should be used, especially regarding the administration of doses and the DPT length. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate a pediatric population with a history of mild NIR to amoxicillin (AMX) or to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMX/CL) who underwent a diagnostic workup including a DPT with the culprit drug, to understand if a graded DPT or, instead, a single full dose could be the most appropriate way of administration in clinical practice. METHODS: The data of children were retrospectively analyzed for a 5-year period, with demographic and clinical characteristics collected. We reported the allergy workup and the results of the DPT performed with the administration of incremental doses and a prolonged DPT at home for a total of 5 days. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-four patients were included. Overall, 23/354 (6.5%) DPTs were positive: 11/23 patients showed a reaction after 2-8 h after the last dose on the 1st or 2nd day (1 reacted 30 min after the last dose), 1/23 reacted with urticaria 30 min after the first dose, 11/23 reacted at home on the 5th day of the DPT. CONCLUSION: This paper indirectly suggests that a single therapeutic dose administered on the 1st day of a DPT could be safe in the diagnostic workup of mild NIR to AMX/CL. Moreover, this could be less time-consuming as patients would spend less time in the hospital, also considering the public health restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Case Report: Self-Administration of Omalizumab in an Adolescent With Severe Asthma During SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Acute asthma remains one of the most frequent causes of children's access to healthcare. Asthma exacerbation is an essential defining characteristic of its severity, and respiratory infections entail increased risks of exacerbations with potential hospitalization. In the literature, contradictory findings have been reported about the risk and severity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in patients affected by asthma, with several implications for its management. Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody therapy is meant for patients affected by severe persistent allergic asthma without adequate control with other treatments. Indeed, biological therapies, such as omalizumab, are used as add-on treatments (step 5 in the Global Initiative for Asthma report) for severe asthma with several benefits, including a reduction in the frequency of exacerbations. To the best of our knowledge, we hereby report the first case in which an adolescent with severe allergic asthma treated with omalizumab has switched to self-administration at home during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Based on our peculiar experience, physicians may consider switching to self-administration of omalizumab at home, even during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. However, more extensive research data from future studies are needed to confirm these first findings.

Managing food allergy immunotherapy in children during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Food allergy immunotherapy is a promising allergen-specific approach to manage food allergy in children, although it is not exempt from adverse events, even severe. The adverse events are not predictable and furthermore cofactors can play a role in triggering them. During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients on food allergy immunotherapy should be provided with suggestions on how to proceed in the event of COVID-19 infection occurring or is suspected. These recommendations would be of support to clinical practitioners dealing with patients on food allergy immunotherapy since there is little data in the literature on the topic.